Skip to content

the brotherhood of allah ?

July 18, 2017





the hour husbands? 



and what of its followers?


From → Uncategorized

  1. opheliart permalink

    who is looking unintelligent now? and … who can you trust? everyone (group-body of people?) reacting to this LIE as if it was true… is really …

    showing itself as not wanting a peaceful resolution? remove those who lie so that people have better choices … on what is trustworthy?

    it really is something to watch … how they cannot see what is staring them in the face …

  2. opheliart permalink

    pluralism, a theological word, minus the MYSTICISM of the EAST … does not exist. in Essence, based on Truth … (this foundation) … pluralism does not exist. it exists in the academic of indifference … but not in the Heart of Truth.

    there is not a single man out there in this Day that can challenge the above with any real credibility or source of intellect. why? he is not in the East, therefore he is unaware of its construct. it would be like a goat trying to thread a needle using his hooves.

    • opheliart permalink

      “In a universe of electrons and selfish genes, blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, other people are going to get lucky, and you won’t find any rhyme or reason in it, nor any justice. The universe that we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pitiless indifference.”
      ― Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life

      never read the book. why? it does not speak to me or for me. does it make him against me? in the manner of its comment, yes. thousands and thousands around the world were (are?) influenced by dawkins’ writing. his theology. creating thousands and thousands more atheist?

      what is IN the Eye of the Beholder? if a Supreme … Being, not indifferent, what would {this} See? if of the Supreme, would {this} not see his own Child? but if … female, child … man … is property, oath-driven and sworn in (also through allegiance to party, creed, ideology, academic credential) …

      what is his advantage … on the manner of ill, the ills of society? is he responsible or irresponsible? and if the Beholder rejects (reasons not withstanding) what he does not know … as Man or Supreme Being … what becomes his quest? what does he thrive for?

      • opheliart permalink

        what it comes down to … in any given Day? is Man to be trusted? can he be trusted as a source of Wisdom? Truth? Justice? Light or Love?

  3. opheliart permalink


    they won’t even pay for much needed investigating for the clergy-staff child sex abuse; they are an institution that denies female and treats her as lesser in the EYES OF THE LORD, and they are cavalier in their support of a regime, industry, policy and penance (think rapist priests) of a god/king/headship of rome, not america …

    why would any civil human being think this a good thing? money coming from abusive foreign entity is where you put your time, money and trust? so … where – how does this abusive entity NOT changed if you do not give it incentive to change?

    man-o-daze! what … mindset are these under?

    • opheliart permalink

      G J asks why the pope is doing this?

      consider this:

      a democrat lies about what a president said in a meeting of 6 politicians. he chooses a black on white issue and makes sure most of the world reads it. the lazy-ass lying press(s) aren’t interested in the truth about what was actually said, because, they, too, are of this insidious agenda …of lies and deception … and don’t care if violence erupts because of it … and it may be very true that violence is what they are egging for. and RNSwriters and others lap it up, lick the filth, because they don’t know any better (ignorant?) or because they get paid … to not post truthfully/more fully? so what’s this have to do with the pope of rome?

      simple understanding if you know where … to learn … the truth.

      • opheliart permalink

        I saw The Post last weekend. if you did not bother to watch the recent documentary on the vietnam war … maybe you should catch THE POST. wasn’t it the same problem then as now … press in the politicians pockets until citizens realize who initiates these wars? bradlee and jfk … best buds or was it the case of jfk knowing exactly who to butter up?

        when the death and destruction begins … millions of lives lost, your children dead … so young … who will be to blame? hey, you guys enthroned jfk and others, and still can’t get enough of him, like he’s your holy political god, and yet he allowed, even advocated … for more death to protect image-reputation. sound familiar? who are his moral gods? the pope of rome, bishops? having shuffled criminal priest to other parishes, lying along the way … to hide these awful crimes … to save image-reputation? to avoid humiliation? what kind of person does this? those without a SOUL? indifferent, ignorance, arrogant bastards? did you not HEAR the news … did you not want to know the truth? are you still in denial, like you are on the clergy-staff child sex abuse in the RCC, and the unjust pay wage of women, and poor treatment of women in many religious and other … industries …

        the rise in AIDS, abuses, murders …

        what are you brining upon the people? I don’t like liars.

  4. opheliart permalink

    a little difficult to type with a 16-week old puppy on my lap.

  5. opheliart permalink

    this is getting more and more ridiculous by the day. he said-he didn’t say …
    so what did he really say? what I HEAR is that he did not say what democrats say he said (oh, and BTW, those of you in your entertainment fun who have said things derogatory, degrading about women … have 0 place to say hoot on any of this, and that leaves out more than half the entertainment business!) trump is not well. stop your dangerous lies and get serious about your job serving the people. you people are a disgrace to …

    the intelligent mind.

    but what did he actually say? you ask. the post says the 2 senators lied for trump.

    where did the post get its information about what was said? a man who lied previously about another attack? (think on that a moment). what did trump actually say? you would need to know exactly … the topic discussed, and what followed. but do ask who said what that might have invited any response derogatory? do you know? I hear a democrat said something … mighty arrogant. do you know what it is?

    you see, one cannot say for sure what was intended if one has not the fuller story. democrat is looking desperate … no? and please understand, trump is not qualified for that position, and certainly not a man we would trust … but the democrat? sheesh … like a ticking time bomb awaits their every gesture. they are just not intelligent or sincere or … truth filled enough to counter trumpism, or whatever it is people call the current admin. democrat has just as much of a s***-hole record as the republican and he does not understand how to work … where he does not get WHAT he WANTS, how he wants it …
    and he would sell your dear children to a bloody war if he needed to protect his institution!

    just watch … PAY ATTENTION! you will see it for yourselves.

  6. opheliart permalink

    what if you had 100 dollars and a liberal-left national came to your country, saying, give me 50% of that 100 … would you ask, what for?

    so I can set up my religion, my unjust and derelict industries.

    oh, gee … why not take 100% so that I can disappear …? the liberal-left thinks he is ENTITLED to take from wherever-whatever he wants … for whatever he believes he needs …

    for whatever it is he deems worthy. there have been ongoing crimes—an epidemic to be sure—for ages and ages, but he walks by these on the side of the road, in full view, to ingratiate himself, to set up for himself another venue … that will create

    an epidemic.

    so watch what happens …with his pot …

    • opheliart permalink

      that iran deal … it will always look to us exactly like what it is …

      giving an unjust, terrorist nation (and its allies?) $, a LOT of $, out of your/our pocket, to keep it from attacking us … when all it did was give an unjust, terrorist nation an excuse to break the law, break its promise (the deal? based on promise or compromise?) and build its military to go to war with what will not give it what is wants, where, when, how it wants. who-what IN HIS RIGHT mind makes deals with unjust terrorist nationals?

  7. opheliart permalink

    not worried about mormonISM. it’s just a shrew in a yard of many yards.

    • opheliart permalink

      try and call me anti-mormon and you will get …

      reminded, in ways that you cannot imagine, that these religions are ANTI-female!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: