Skip to content

then let the INVESTIGATIONS begin!

June 28, 2016

any politician ignoring these abuses, sidling up with popes, bishops, imams and the like are living a lie———yes? why should anyone believe a politician/lawmaker who denies these are very serious crimes that SHOULD HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED YEARS AGO!

why is the GOVERNMENT OF THE US ignoring this? we have questioned these catholic morals and law abiding ethics several times now but …

what’s in it for the obama-clinton-trump administration to buddy up to popes and hand over taxpayer dollars to criminals unless … 

they, too, are … 


Catholic bishop apologizes for ‘betrayal’ of sexual abuse

Danno Croquet_Player • 8 hours ago
That is the problem. The sexual assault of children and the coverup was exposed thirty years ago. The only reason that this continues is the churches refusal to sincerely and openly come totally clean, repent and try to make whole, lives that were shattered. They do not want to do any of this.
They must come clean and stop fighting victims and finally take care of them. They have had thirty years to get this.

If church leaders continue to resist restorative justice for the victims they have created and continue actions that lack the Catholic values that they preach about.
They should be charged with RICO crimes and have to sit and face a Federal commission and an investigation of every diocese in the US. Australia and the UK. have conducted federal investigations and they were very successful at forcing a lot of the truth to come out. Our political system is so corrupt that a religious organization is allowed to have a tax free status and yet yield power over the political system. The power and control that the church uses to bully politicians is sickening. The corrupt politicians are just as bad. The possibility of true justice seems hopeless to me and many other victims of the Catholic Church.

I guess it is way too much to ask that church leaders act in accordance with who and what they claim to be; Holy men running an organization that is based on the teachings of Christ.

If this was Walmart raping children then covering it up, lying and then fighting victims in the most sleazy ways. (Church lawyers continue to use any strategy no matter how dirty or immoral to sidestep accountability for crimes and destruction of lives.)

If this was Walmart doing this, the Federal Government would be all over them and citizens would probably burn the place to the ground.
This is supposed to be a church but acts more like the mob.


From → Uncategorized

  1. opheliart permalink

    danno, they are not holy men. they are deniers, liars and thieves, also abusers, awaiting their 30 pcs.

    • opheliart permalink

      the vatican has much to hide. their vaults are so full of stuff that inquiring minds would have a field day … some things they keep hidden would shock the world into …

      recognizing they have followed a false teachings for centuries … beginning with:

      The DICTATUS papae, a collection of twenty-seven short statements dealing with the Roman primacy, is no doubt one of the most synoptic manifestos in the existence on the subject …

      because they wrote the manifesto is it true? does it make them harbingers of TRUTH? because they established themselves AUTHORITY ON GOD—MOUTHPIECE OF THE LORD through statements like:

      9. That the pope is the only one whose feet are to be kissed by all princes.

      11. That his title is unique in the world.

      12. That he may depose emperors.

      19. That he himself may be judged by no one. (not even God?)

      oh, and here is a kicker and should have alarmed every living being throughout … but it really made governments more powerful and more abusive to the people.


      huh, in case you have no ears to hear, the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IS NEVER MENTIONED IN THE WRITINGS, certainly not as KING, QUEEN, GOD, LORD, LIFE, LOVE and any pursuit of {this}. as a matter of fact, THE CHRIST OF THE LIVING GOD WARNS ALL PEOPLE ABOUT THESE FALSE DOGMAS.

      and what does man do? weds himself to the gods of the golden calf. he has learned nothing from what came before. and today the nations bow to and kiss the feet of these arrogant and diseased institutional heads while …


      why trust any politician? who are in league with the dynasties of RELIGIOUS INDWELLING through their leaders. to be perfectly honest, under the OBAMA ADMIN there is no separation of church and state when influence and power and law enforcement do not SAFEGUARD the people, ESP THE CHILDREN, from these hierarchies.

      the democrats … heck, democracy … will lose its headship for it has failed the smallest, the most vulnerable. don't you see … IT IS WRITTEN! only a denier is the fool. so why deny this institution is a nemesis and a disease? it is a danger to the health and wellbeing of families and …

      these will reap what they have sown, if it is destruction they are ruled by–feed from. destroying lives … then they will see their own destruction.

  2. opheliart permalink

    this is interesting and supremely telling. a muslim woman is complaining that she is being harassed because of her religion and wearing her hijab. she says that she does not know if the LEGAL SYSTEM will protect her or not.

    QUESTION ONE: does her RELIGION protect her? her god/prophet? from injustice, harassment and discrimination?
    if her religion/god/prophet does not protect her why should she expect that another legal system would protect her?

    QUESTION TWO: does her RELIGIOUS POLITICAL LEGAL SYSTEM protect women? does it view women worthy of protection or only under the strictest laws—it’s own?

    QUESTION THREE: what of women not of her religious indwelling under her islamic political beliefs and practices—how are these PROTECTED?

    QUESTION FOUR: would she be protected by a legal system should her husband decide to beat/hit her? or if she desires a divorce? will she be protected by a legal system?

    Question FIVE: why would a woman in islamic dress expect that any PATRIARCHAL GOVERNMENT protect her? women have been threatened, harassed, discriminated against … beaten, raped, abused and misused … for just being female … for as long as man has been man and much of it born from PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY SUCH AS ISLAMIC SOCIETY … as woman is viewed as second class citizens. did she expect others to respect her as an equal when her own members do not respect her as equal?

    seriously, where do these religionists get their teaching?

    • opheliart permalink

      not going to apologize for not feeling even the slightest bit sorry for that woman complaining.

      if she wants to make a bold statement about poor treatment of islamic women then let her start with her own misogynistic members and that child rapist calling himself god—their war lord prophet who murdered and murdered and murdered … and the continuation of discrimination and poor treatment of women.

  3. opheliart permalink

    john brings up a very good point. he responds to the pooh and … with:

    Herman wrote “Is there a problem with this or do you simply have a problem with being under the authority of a government?”

    No, I have no problem being a US citizen.

    I simply believe in the separation of church and state. I had no idea that the Orthodox Church had not fully come to grips with this concept as Kyrill states.

    There are churches that do not seek 501c3 status and have no problems with the IRS or the state.

    The Founding Fathers assured that the Church would always be separate from the state and thus not regulated nor controlled by it. Churches are inherently exempt from IRA control or regulation. In a word, the Church does not need the permission nor approval of the United States Government to exist or operate in a tax deductible status.

    The First Amendment provided for religious liberty. Christians in America have the opportunity to keep God’s church pure and undefiled and to perform the great commission without restrictions from state or federal governments.

    Even though the civil government made this offer, churches did not have to accept it. Since the ratification of the First Amendment, the federal government has never forced a church to incorporate or get 501©(3) status. The Supreme Court still understands that the state cannot legally interfere with a church who does not willingly submit itself to the state.

    For Example:

    “I am not the only IRS employee who’s wondered why churches go to the government and seek permission to be exempted from a tax they didn’t owe to begin with, and to seek a tax deductible status that they’ve always had anyway. Many of us have marveled at how church leaders want to be regulated and controlled by an agency of government that most Americans have prayed would just get out of their lives. Churches are in an amazingly unique position, but they don’t seem to know or appreciate the implications of what it would mean to be free of government control.” (from the Forward of In Caesar’s Grip, by Peter Kershaw)

    “It is impossible to have religious freedom in any nation where churches are licensed to the government. ” George Hansen, Member of Congress (ret.)

  4. opheliart permalink

    the new moderate? given the rising extreme beliefs/practices in the US, extreme believers not of the political left’s typical category of republican or fundamentalist republican, there is a change of landscape. the liberal can no longer point to the republican or even the fundamentalist republican and blame him for the unjust and extreme events occurring not just in america but worldwide. we said the face of religion will change as will the landscape of religion … a number of times in several places. america has BLM, those advocating black power through the new black panthers, cop-haters, islamic terrorists, sharia law advocates both islamic and other (including the pro-palestine advocates), rising orthodox-ultra orthodox judaism, trumpism, and something within the liberal sect we call the liberalist (including the pro-palestine advocates), which is a liberal who is catholic in mindset (universal, as in our way is the only way for ALL people which makes it a CATHOLIC set of beliefs and practices that must be adhered to regardless of events, evidence showing bigotry, racism and misogynistic tendencies and harmful deeds … literal interoperation of creed). the liberalist is the new extreme, the new religious of universal creed, patriarchal in thought and vice, allying itself with sharia indwellers and islamic function. it is a political state, bent on power and control, often attacking opponents by lynching statements before these are allowed to be considered. the opponents are JUDGED by and through a system catholic left thinking, and is why the NT and Christ-centered GNOSTIC LIT never mentions catholic in relation to the Christ.

    this sifts those once considered ‘extreme’ to a somewhat moderate stance in relation to …

    hmm … so there it is for all to witness. what will ‘catholic’ do when his system is revealed to be unnaturally patriarchal and undesirable? fascist? uncommunicative? ignorant of the real problems and how these are rooted?

    • opheliart permalink

      like in the days of the inquisition … the liberalist, like sharia law, is what in mindset?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: