Skip to content

mom, your child …

May 6, 2016

will not be forgotten.


Police say Scott was harassing and groping three young women near the school cafeteria, and Phelps came to their aid by trying to intervene. Scott began stabbing Phelps, who collapsed on the ground near the school’s infirmary and later died, police said.






From → Uncategorized

  1. opheliart permalink

    2 Corinthians 10King James Version (KJV)

    10 Now I Paul myself beseech you by the meekness and gentleness of Christ, who in presence am base among you, but being absent am bold toward you:

    2 But I beseech you, that I may not be bold when I am present with that confidence, wherewith I think to be bold against some, which think of us as if we walked according to the flesh.

    3 For though we walk in the flesh, we do not war after the flesh:

    4 (For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;)

    5 Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;

    6 And having in a readiness to revenge all disobedience, when your obedience is fulfilled.

    7 Do ye look on things after the outward appearance? if any man trust to himself that he is Christ’s, let him of himself think this again, that, as he is Christ’s, even so are we Christ’s.

    8 For though I should boast somewhat more of our authority, which the Lord hath given us for edification, and not for your destruction, I should not be ashamed:

    9 That I may not seem as if I would terrify you by letters.

    10 For his letters, say they, are weighty and powerful; but his bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible.

    11 Let such an one think this, that, such as we are in word by letters when we are absent, such will we be also in deed when we are present.

    12 For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.

    13 But we will not boast of things without our measure, but according to the measure of the rule which God hath distributed to us, a measure to reach even unto you.

    14 For we stretch not ourselves beyond our measure, as though we reached not unto you: for we are come as far as to you also in preaching the gospel of Christ:

    15 Not boasting of things without our measure, that is, of other men’s labours; but having hope, when your faith is increased, that we shall be enlarged by you according to our rule abundantly,

    16 To preach the gospel in the regions beyond you, and not to boast in another man’s line of things made ready to our hand.

    17 But he that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.

    18 For not he that commendeth himself is approved, but whom the Lord commendeth.

    • opheliart permalink

      12 For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.

  2. opheliart permalink

    would like to address this more:

    a comment on gushee’s commentary:

    Well_Read Josh Weinstein • an hour ago
    no, there is no god. the monotheistic god was an invention of the egyptians then the Israelites adapted it. It wasn’t supposed to be a real thing, we were to live AS IF someone were watching, not actually watching. Jews needed a text to be one of the legal roman religions, so they wrote the torah and were accepted.

    it’s all a LOT less sexy then what our parents beat into us as children.

    I always have to do a double take when I read these types of comments. “no, there is no god”
    um, YES, there is a GOD … there may not be SPIRIT for you as you have no RELATIONSHIP in {this} … but I AM in a Place where I DO have a relationship and since you are not ME and do not KNOW ME … there is no way you speak for me. there is no way you know what I AM or WHERE I AM. if you are unaware of Spirit, that is your business not mine … as my life is not yours and your life is not mine. when the atheist speaks in absolutes he is no different from those of religion claiming universal belief: his. it is like someone saying to me, “you are dead” when they say, “there is no god.” it makes no sense to one experiencing Spirit. I kid you not when I say there is Spirit, both good and evil. maybe one day he will experience this and recognize his own lack of awareness in life alien to his own understanding.

    • opheliart permalink

      let’s go at this using the current roman pontiff’s “dream”: christians worship the god of islam; the god of christianity and the god of islam are the same

      can you see one reason why I am NOT a christian in the words of religion? first, christians do not worship as the muslims. each religion has a very different PROPHET and PROPHESY. that alone is enough to debunk the pope’s words. it may be HIS dream that all fall in line under his “europe” (and btw, I was not aware that the vatican still owned europe) … his realm of worship in his caliphate understanding … but a believer in SPIRIT is not bound by his law. his dogma. religion is just a manufactured statement on how to believe in something higher than mankind. that is how we view it. religion is not necessary to experience GOD of the Living. {this} is not creeds and … ritualistic metaphor OR … law stating an ordination claims power over the people to do X, Y and Z.

      Spirit does not operate that way. THIS cannot be controlled by man—any man. IT does not exist in arbitrary law.

      there is enough evidence throughout history and even today that shows the template of religious signature. and islam is not christian and christianity born from the early TEACHINGS is not islam. does the pope not understand how ISLAM was born? his statement dismisses what is the CHRIST. it says that Christ was never needed because islam’s prophet is the messenger of Spirit of the Living God, that usurps Jesus and bears the cross of Christ.

      is this true, muslim? didn’t think so.

      um, maybe pope is just playing politics, his caliphate organization. this brings all of roman catholicism into question … again. is it even of the Christ? does it bear witness of this Truth? whether you agree or disagree with the Teachings of Christ … you cannot make that error by saying christian and muslim worship the same god. it makes no sense, unless christian desires to worship the prophet of islam then they become islamic and can not claim CHRIST Jesus as “lord”. AND, there is nothing in the Writings that claim roman catholicism or islam as IDENTIFYING IN NATURE to the One. nothing. so … is the pope manipulating the public? using his big, fat political religious seat to achieve his dream? yep. it’s all about the vatican’s political agenda under male dominate insignia. this it telling.

      why do you go along with this manipulation? the deception? sure, muslims can worship their gods and even christians can worship the almighty dollar and the influential titles with the fancy hats and lavish quarters, but JESUS was not instituting a religion. no where in the Writings do we hear him advocate for roman catholicism, islam, judaism or any other:

      12 … For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.

      • opheliart permalink

        so why does someone like gushee not address this while praising the pope, using the pope’s words to try to make himself look credible? because he is “catholic” (of catholic mindset). religion by way of what roma set up is his savior … and if pope and co fail through deception and dishonesty … so does gushee. also, if gushee spoke out on this he would probably lose his cushy seat at mercer and … every other religious/academic seat he likes so much, but we shall see …boy, wouldn’t I love to be surprised 😉

        another reason we are not bound. if the SPIRIT says TAKE UP AND FOLLOW ME … we go because OUR VERY LIFE IS AT STAKE and if religion keeps people penned and a storm comes … a storm that says: depart from me you of lawlessness …
        what happens to that house built on vatican hill?

        yes, that one … that has the big wall to protect its ordained religious style, while the peasants outside till the soil to feed the ordained’s big appetites and extravagant dining …

  3. opheliart permalink

    mom don’t let your kids grow up to be catholic?

    at least not during their fertile years?

    well, we have posted on this many times, but here is a catholic who disagrees with catholicism … which makes her a PROTESTANT? 😀 😀 😀 :

    DrRosemaryEileenMcHugh • an hour ago
    As a family physician who is Catholic, I do not recommend any woman to go for care to a Catholic hospital during her reproductive years. The bishops are in charge of reproductive issues rather than the doctors. A woman’s life can be at serious risk and even death can occur, because of the directives of bishops who have no knowledge of medicine.

    Sadly, when cases come to trial, the judges who are Catholic can dismiss a case out of hand, to protect the Catholic Church from accountability, without understanding the dangers that women are in when they are at the mercy of the bishops rules in Catholic run hospitals. Very sad.

    I am glad to see that women are beginning to speak up for their rights to receive the normal standard of care, since Catholic hospitals give substandard care to women, in my view as a family physician who no longer is willing to practice in a Catholic hospital.
    Sincerely, Dr Rosemary Eileen McHugh, MD, MSpir

    • opheliart permalink

      every time I read the comments on this guy 98% are essentially calling him a hypocrite, and he gets awards for it and they bow to him like he is their god. it really isn’t funny. it is truly sad what is going on in that domain. he is pedestaling europe now to make others look bad … like a-m-e-r-i-c-a .. a nation he and his bishops are losing control of but … wait until the investigations really get under way … bye-bye bishops. I would not want to have anything to do with that misogynistic conference.

      the vatican’s agenda is so slip shod sheer it is not difficult to see their world agenda

      but check out this post:

      Rob3 hours ago
      The Pope has his own selfish aspirations in this fabricated crisis. He wants to expand the Vatican’s empire by flooding the developed nations with third world people, so that way the upcoming Vatican III can inherit all of the military might and Protestant innovations and technology to create a global Crusade. Good thing Trump is doing something about the border issue, because that voting bloc is instrumental in engulfing the US and enabling the Vatican’s empire to usurp power and inherit the MIC and military might of the US.

      • opheliart permalink

        one could easily say that the pope of the roman catholic church is fueling the trump agenda in america (and elsewhere) through his constant guilt rhetoric and judging people for not doing what he says they should do, and in this case, the obsession with insisting nations take this on … which is really about positioning bishops for greater control. in case you have not been paying attention

        and that’s another reason why he/the vatican does NOT WANT THOSE BISHOPS and clergy … staff and … INVESTIGATED FOR ABUSE AND OTHER CRIMES …
        they have been planning this agenda for a while

        but who-what in america is dragging its feet on these investigations and why would any decent person ignore the epidemic of clergy/bishop/staff child sex abuse on american soil?

  4. opheliart permalink

    the insanity of it all

    this is terrible … had the man been watching these kids each day until he saw security was not there? how did he know to go that day … when the guard was out? or are there so many mentally sick people on the loose looking for opportunities to strike? or was this a person who knew the child? had been watching that particular child and was waiting for an opportunity to attack that child? did the man know the guard and know he was out that day? is that area so dangerous that the chances were very high that someone would attack an unguarded playground?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: