Skip to content

the carnal and the carnivore

February 4, 2016
Advertisements

From → Uncategorized

13 Comments
  1. opheliart permalink

    http://www.religionnews.com/2016/02/03/obama-visits-us-mosque-for-first-time-in-his-presidency/

    and they post a really pretty woman’s face wrapped in …

    boy do i dislike being treated like i am an idiot and obama from the start of his religious campaigning has behaved questionably in all the grandstanding. when people came to the shores of the US they were looking for a new life … okay, some came to build themselves a covenant … others to get the hell away from the covenants and still, covenants reign … in government. stop telling me what i should do and not do, obama … and stop creating an atmosphere of anti-muslim. you, obama, you and your advisors are the ones creating this environment! and you can’t even see it.

    someone states a reality and bam! label: ANTI-MUSLIM.
    no one is allowed to talk about the reality of caliphate religious donors and the DISCRIMINATION within these houses. please, what’s up with this? obama, you are the one meddling in religious affairs—using this to your advantage. so sad.

    YOU ARE SILENCING VICTIMS, obama. you are making a big deal out of this when you should stay the hell out of these affairs …
    but if you want a big deal—you will get your big deal …

    now, what looks off here?
    we do not want the female to be viewed as LESSER … SECOND CLASS CITIZENS! unable to acquire INFLUENTIAL SEATS. lawmakers, what don’t you get about this? you praise and pedestal the bigotry of these men, their ignorance … and for what? votes? and we do not want tax payer dollars going to government fetishes. how hard is this to understand … along with growing populations of …

    and you say you are concerned about overburdening the environment—worried about climate?

    ATHEISTS, WHERE IS YOUR VOICE ON THIS? GAYS? WOMEN? is your god obama saying everything that you want to hear? if so … you are being betrayed.

    • opheliart permalink

      samuel johnston February 4, 2016 at 10:09 am
      About twenty years ago, if memeory serves, the Birmingham Baptists paid for a printed supplement to the Birmingham News (our largest newspaper). This very fat supplement listed the names of all of our residents who were GOING TO HELL. (I qualified).
      If you do not believe this insane story, contact the newspaper for verification.
      Wnen I say our Baptists are mean spirited and , I know what I am talking about. To be fair, they are also schizophrenic.

      take this statement … hard to believe—right?

      ouch … how many are squirming in their seats on this. but how different is this from the many teachings put out … and the many practices … that expel people, deny people … saying essentially the very same thing as what samuel posted but in glamorous, pretty-faced ways? big beautiful architecture … all the finery … just lovely in those silk garments but … underneath it all is what? the rcc, and those like it have been telling people for centuries who is going to hell! so very many didn’t have a choice … they were brutally victimized, tortured … murdered … some still are, because of these ‘authority’ pleasers. why does anyone continue to support and pay into this madness? obama! what say YOU? we thought you might know better but … we see that business is business … votes are votes and no, you cannot pull the wool over our eyes.

      you stink.

      • opheliart permalink

        http://marksilk.religionnews.com/2016/02/04/obama-goes-to-mosque/

        i would post at rns but my posts don’t go through …

        so, mark silk … because i care and vocalize on the discrimination these religionists promote as “good”, professional, mature, and a healthy step for society, i am not grown up? but you are the one praising pope fran and islam … in his teaching: denial of gays, women … and that dogmatic treatment of Jesus.

        are you a misogynist, homophobic, ignorant believer, mark? how does it feel to be called these labels? how does it feel to be viewed as less than … going to hell … ?

        but, of course, it’s RELIGION, like government …

    • opheliart permalink

      http://www.religionnews.com/2016/02/04/obama-prayer-breakfast-jesus-good-cure-fear/

      and he knew he had to say something to make it look ‘good’ after the mosque memorandum …

      uh-huh …

      it’s like watching a cartoon … all of it … unfortunately, people believe it to be real

      what must the atheists be thinking? most of them voted full throttle for a man they believed was very low key religious/believer of some sort … even atheist max said he is probably an atheist (did he ask the president this? gee, and what did he say?)… and now, wham bam hallelujah, pope royal advisor of the gods francis! glory to rcc on the highest vatican hill, come join us in congress with your political words of roman wisdom! then the islamic god … wait, rome? now, Jesus? what happened to ELIJAH? for that matter, what happened to abraham?

      😀 and the atheist groans in his seat … my god, my god, my god … my butt is sore 😉

      is it:

      http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=utf-8&fr=aaplw&p=billy+idol+dancing+with+myself

      or is it:

      http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=utf-8&fr=aaplw&p=working+for+the+weekend

      atheists, nonbelievers,

      I do not blame you one bit for thinking all of this is fog business. please, please please do not count me in with this fiasco …

      I AM … of gnosis.

      • opheliart permalink

        http://www.religionnews.com/2016/02/04/bernie-sanders-disappoints-atheists-strong-religious-feelings/#comments

        allow us to ‘splain this in a relevatory way …

        atheist, what bernie is essentially saying is that he recognizes religion as a useful tool for getting something done … within and without. remember the:

        religion provides structure but should never exceed love … ?

        comment___

        Thomas Didymus February 5, 2016 at 8:51 am
        I’m with the atheists on this one. Bernie is of course an atheist. But ‘atheist’ is still a bad word, so people like him who don’t believe in God feel obliged to make religious noises.

        If you believe that there is no supernatural being with psychological states you are an atheist. There is no point in adopting some linguistically revisionary account of what ‘God’ means so that you can count as ‘believing in God’ if you have ‘religious and spiritual feelings’, or if you believe in Spinoza’s Deus sive Natura, or if you’re ‘committed to an agapistic way of life’ or whatever.

        If you don’t believe in a conscious supernatural being you are an atheist. And there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that. There’s nothing either good or bad about being an atheist or about being a religious believer. It’s just metaphysics.

        —-
        ;D … seriously thomas, playing at gnosis … what you just said is royal rubbish.

        it is more than believing, ‘fool’ … which shows ‘your’ fruits.
        you can always tell when someone has never experienced SPIRIT of the LIVING GOD … he dances around the fire singing metamorphic tunes.

        _____

        commenter:

        Alexis February 4, 2016 at 7:24 pm
        This is a very very Jewish answer. All the atheists who were upset about his INCREIBLY thoughtful answer are still operating from a Christian normative/default point of view. As a Jewish person who doesn’t subscribe to the Christian view of God (because Judaism is NOT Christianity lite), I’m thankful Sanders took the time to explain his (very Jewish and NOT CHRISTIAN) perspective.

        ? somebody sure has an interesting opinion about christians (not sure if it’s sharing in any way not negative … hmmm … SEEMS HE HAS NEVER READ ANY BOOKS EASTERN ORTHODOX OR any of THE PHILOKALIA writers, OR ANY GNOSTIC LIT, which is not christianity as a religion, but is OF the Christ)… where does this guy feed and why in GOD’s NAME would he think the ATHEIST has a “christian” viewpoint, unless he is confused with the universal (catholic) view, which not all christians have (sorry to disrupt your ego, alexis … WOULD that be a very jewish thing, alexis? a rather yuge ego?) salkin, looks like you may have some yuge work on your hands 😉 *must be one of rns susan’s friends
        ________

        another comment-response … u can look up the comments to see all that is posted (I have to keep adding these 😉

        Bob B. February 5, 2016 at 3:10 pm
        Your vanilla pudding with cherry on top description ignores the fact the Judaic sacred scriptures still enshrine historical genocidal campaigns against inconveniently located Canaanite tribes as sacred, gloriful, God-ordered massacres of every Canaanite man, woman, & child, in what appears to have been a straight land grab.
        Johua 10:40, QUOTE: “So Joshua subdued the whole region, including the hill country, the Negev, the western foothills and the mountain slopes, together with all their kings. He left no survivors. He totally destroyed all who breathed, just as the LORD, the God of Israel, had commanded.”
        -Amen?

        *me: seldom do I see on rns the jews of judaism acknowledging these passages. a-max posts them on occasion but never do I see any of the religious explain what it means—-what it is saying. true or false? some dislike JESUS, reject Jesus … even state how bad christians treated the jews … but what of this story and others like it? is their god of abraham a violent, murderous …
        ________

        now, the question is and always will be: where and how is religion (house by house) a pain in the a**, dangerous, costing the taxpayer too much time and money, deceptive, inconsistent, abusive, dishonest, corrupt, hogging all the attention, redirecting time and money away from the more important issues, causing more harm than good, bleeding the people dry, covering up crimes? and misleading — misinforming the people … ?

        and where and how might it be serving a useful and just purpose?

        and atheist, you, too, can have this music and beer fest. oh, wait, you already have your own religion … it’s called, ATHEISM.

        you’re just going about it all wrong … form an order, buy some beer brewing equipment, hire some guys who can chant, drink a few pints and gurgle away. c’mon … make money off of those gregorys you know and make it real. gregory of san diego and gregory of long island and gregory of the poconos (that has a nice ring to it) …

  2. opheliart permalink

    and people may say, but that’s not what this is about …

    oh? you think not? what has happened since the beginning? women were priests and so much more in the MOVEMENT toward just and correct teaching, but what happened? it’s just a repeat … it’s rome playing its usual bull for world control. no, you say, that’s conspiracy! lol 😀 then why hasn’t the rcc changed its laws? even in the obvious hypocrisy of the abuses, scandals … and the sexually active gay rc priests, the vatican continues to pretend they are advisory on spiritual matters. it’s ridiculous, and how is islam any better for america? a catholic said to me in communing … oh, a good two+ years ago “they will send women back to the dark ages” he actually heard this in prayer! … “they” meaning these caliphate religious institutions INCLUDING GOVERNMENT … in their alliances. obama has two daughters … he should know better, but it seems he cares only about appearances. well, the appearance stinks … as we said.

    you know … i wouldn’t blink if islam turned on rome and its clergy because they feared this rcc and islam worshipping the same god. it’s what we shared many moons ago … the catholic will be attacked, and, well … they receive what they believe?

      • opheliart permalink

        how do you promote patriarchal dominionism (aka pope francis) and denounce what you perceive to be dominionist america by using ELIJAH as a negative typecast?

        ____

        commenter:
        the mad professor February 4, 2016 at 5:36 pm
        Why are American evangelicals so prone to perverse forms of nationalism? Because they have a weak ecclesiology. Because they have no real doctrine of the church, they cannot make sense of all of the biblical emphasis on God’s People without substituting some other socio-political entity, either America or the modern nation-state of Israel, NEITHER of which can be regarded as being in a covenantal relationship with the Lord our God.

        _____

        well, there you go … somebody has an agenda … righto, professor? get this: they have no real DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH …

        what he is saying is … no ROMAN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH … and, what exactly is that church, professor?
        the one world religion called roman catholic islam?

        ____

        such posers …

        anti-semitism in roman catholic garb? or just a liberal christian … that just happens to mention ‘weak’ ecclesiology and doctrine of church.

        uh-huh ..

        good thing I am “banned” from that boy’s club … or I would swallow him up. *burp*

  3. opheliart permalink

    they are really out in full force … my-oh-my …

    they want your children, folks 😦

    • opheliart permalink

      and what’s truly pathetic is no “PASTOR” has the balls to come out and state this … to call out these patriarchs and imams, bishops and others, both religious and politicians on their …

      BIGOTRY AND DISCRIMINATION. all hail, pope fran? all hail muha …

  4. opheliart permalink

    moving on …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: