Skip to content

last in line …

February 2, 2016





From → Uncategorized

  1. opheliart permalink

    some things need to be said because … well, people really do just skim … a quick graze … without looking at the broader picture.

  2. opheliart permalink

    professor points aside …

    what I have been seeing is the vatican wanting jeb bush to gain the seat of the w. h.

    broadly speaking—speaking in terms of the larger pic—of course, we know there are catholic members all over the place on this election … and when we speak of catholic mindset, we are not saying all members are of catholic mindset; however, the world is largely within a universal way of thinking, offspring of roma … and … it appears many are proud of it, but remember what ELIJAH said (and they said not a word) …
    but, what we wish to share here is the dynamics of this case. bush is sage turf for the vatican (hierarchy) … uh-huh. an episcopalian gone catholic? looks good for the press and … bush is not known for radical tendencies. he is kinda the workable — usual — type that the rcc can continue doing business with. he’s ‘catholic’ … no major upsets … not like having a non religion jew in the seat, and trump … no, too much a shooter from the hip and the nay on the refugee-immigrant entry DOES NOT WORK for vatican histrionics, business and needs. nope … so, j bush … what’s up with this?

    I sense the vats think rubio is too young for the job and … sense that rubio is hoping for VP this round then the big seat on the next.

    what would scare the dresses off the vats? bush leaving the rcc? breaking from brand religion? this is his only hope, folks … to make a bold statement like this.

    • opheliart permalink–election.html

      all kinds of strategy

      sending out rumors that carson was out of the race? hmm …

      there is something outstanding that people have not seen yet and it’s called …

      foreign policy

      • opheliart permalink

        and obama should have stayed away from the religion thing altogether. he should never have engaged with any religious figures the way he has. we have shared on this enough now … the consequences of their decisions will be seen today and for a long while.

  3. opheliart permalink

    was waiting … waiting to hear on this, and yes, it is as I was seeing glimpses of. and this is not the only one of its type. I am seeing 3 maybe 4 out there like this … coming, coming back … coming. ugh.

  4. opheliart permalink

    after much reading … communing, what I am shown is this:

    yesterday (wed) jonathan merritt did a piece on russell moore. i found it to be well written, and i suppose i agree with him except that i do not view moore as any type of movement. he may be changing the tone of southern baptists but is southern baptist a provocative voice? remember … where did all the mainstay teaching originate? who/what laid the RELIGIOUS CHURCH foundation? from this fortress came much brick and mortar housing … all manmade ideals. bigotry and hypocrisy made up and still make up much of these institutions. there is an ignorance that prevails among the offspring raised from the seed of the constitution of biblical architecture in the name of roman catholicism. eastern orthodoxy has a different temperature but it, too, must understand its housing.

    some feel they are moving a mountain by moving an institution’s beliefs on certain topics, or by treating these differently … instead of allowing abortion and ssm to be front and center they ruminate in other areas to try to give momentum to a large institution. but one thing does not change: their desire to remain a large institution. this is their failing point. this is also true of the rcc (and remember, the members are not permitted to vote their leadership into offices). american orthodox christianity, last i checked, is breaking from the bishops outside america/UK. will they allow women priests and bishops? how could they not … the early christians of the eastern ‘church’ had women priests …

    how do you move a mountain if you can’t see it? how do you move a mountain if YOU are that mountain 😉

    • opheliart permalink

      but this isn’t really about women priests …

      it’s about ideology. it’s about that system of belief and practice. it’s about the carnal and the carnivore.

      what is the difference? the carnal is flesh driven ideal whereas the carnivore (very gnostic prose) seeds in meat verses milk-fed attribute. i do not eat meat, so this is not a fleshly origin … but i do feed in the flesh of the SPIRIT.

      didymos thomas:

      And he said, “Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not experience death.”

      • opheliart permalink

        Jesus said, “Woe to the flesh that depends on the soul; woe to the soul that depends on the flesh.”

        do you believers see our point?

        we shared about clergy being drunk on traditions … let the dead bury the dead. these traditions are posturing for what? answer: the gods of roma.

        this is not the LIVING GOD … in case any one is confused …

        the vatican needs the poor to survive——yes?

  5. opheliart permalink

    Jesus said, “No prophet is accepted in his own village; no physician heals those who know him.”

    *the merritt article (note: the pseudo jack commenter must have been the one who posted on one of mark silk’s commentaries at rns … about the gnostics … the evil world-yada-yada … he writes similarly to the other jack but we saw right away that something seemed projected … but waited to see if someone can figure out who it is because we sense a commenter already posting under other names)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: