Skip to content

The Irrefutable Mirage (Part FIVE)

February 15, 2015

http://marksilk.religionnews.com/2015/02/13/same-sex-marriage-comes-to-alabamaon-same-sex-marriage-alabama-will-not-be-mocked/

oh?  and neither will God!

But this essay is not about the incendiary of Man. This essay is about REALITY. It is a cheap, and often lazy trick of Man to use Scripture to gimme. Funny word gimme. It says a lot about so little. Truth is, we do not pay a lot of attention to firecrackers when the bombs are blazing and limbs are flying. It’s just not cool, but if it’ll help, we will share the elemental design of what Paul is saying in the SPIRIT Language that man cannot receive if he is not within an impartial trust.

 

Let’s look at Scripture—again—more slowly; instead of the jackrabbit run, we look to the tortoise.

…26Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28God blessed them; and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”…

Our image—Our likeness? I don’t think God is referring to Alabamians or Mark Silk, unless these were sitting with the Angels of God before the creation of Man. Let us remind them that no one has ever seen God. This raises a few questions:

What is this image of God with use of OUR? Why might Earth need to be subdued? (meaning: quieten, draw from below)? What was going on before the creation of man? 😀 Boisterous is a good word. Our boisterous Earth … with all its boisterous animals. Then God said, let’s send in the clowns … oops, no … we meant …

Let’s create a different Animal, and we will call him Man, and the gift of CHOICE that is of the Spirit … we will allow this for Man, as well. And one said, “The good or the evil?” (you see, Evil had already made his choice before the creation of Man to the Earth). God said, “My-my … sometimes it is the bad that allows for good, or to know good from bad, but we must give to man a covenant that will provide REASON, lest he fall to his death from overreach while still too young—unable to cross that great divide. Many hands are needed, as well as many hearts.” “Faith and Works?” asked the one. “Indeed,” replied God. And so it was, is and always will be … with Man, who cannot see the trees inside the forest.

***************************************************************

Enoch wrote … 1 And all of them together went and took wives for themselves, each choosing one for himself, and they began to go in to them and to defile themselves with sex with them. Chapter 7.

We will keep it simple. Wives in this passage represent LIFE CHOICES. The going in to means an entering into a covenant—possibly an oath—but most definitely a type of MARRIAGE—with something, and in what Enoch states, it was not of God, which is understood in Spirit Language as defiling self. Defile themselves with sex with them is a phrase having to do with PARTNERING that is not honest. If someone becomes a minister mainly for the purpose of self-importance, control of others, money, praise, fame for personal gain … the gimme factor … this would be a life choice entering into marriage that defiles Truth, thus defiling person. In defiling person, person cannot be one in the Spirit. This is a distancing from God because of illicit or false intent. When God says, I never knew you, He is referring to those, despite doing all kinds of things “in His name”  … He never knew, for they cared not to strive to keep God’s covenant and be of honest intent. Honest is not so much about right and wrong as all fall short. Man’s understanding of what is right and what is wrong is too often seen through a limited lens—a one-sided lens—a partial view—therefore creating a bespectacled image, when what we need is a purer vision through the entering into the bridal chamber of one’s Spiritual well being.

God is not so interested in the specks but the whole countenance of endeavor.

If an eyelash falls into the starter for the making of bread, do you throw it all away, or do you carefully lift the lash and what surrounds it and continue? If the starter has been riddled with things impure, then it must be removed from the table.

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’

***********************************************

Paul speaks of marriage. This from the New International Version … second verse … not as good as the first? Let’s use it anyway.

7 Now for the matters you wrote about: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. 3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. 4 The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. 5 Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. 6 I say this as a concession, not as a command. 7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.

8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

10 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11 But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.

12 To the rest I say this (I, not the Lord): If any brother has a wife who is not a believer and she is willing to live with him, he must not divorce her. 13 And if a woman has a husband who is not a believer and he is willing to live with her, she must not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband has been sanctified through his wife, and the unbelieving wife has been sanctified through her believing husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy.

15 But if the unbeliever leaves, let it be so. The brother or the sister is not bound in such circumstances; God has called us to live in peace. 16 How do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or, how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?


17 Nevertheless, each person should live as a believer in whatever situation the Lord has assigned to them, just as God has called them. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches. 18 Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised. 19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God’s commands is what counts. 20 Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them.

21 Were you a slave when you were called? Don’t let it trouble you—although if you can gain your freedom, do so. 22 For the one who was a slave when called to faith in the Lord is the Lord’s freed person; similarly, the one who was free when called is Christ’s slave. 23 You were bought at a price; do not become slaves of human beings. 24 Brothers and sisters, each person, as responsible to God, should remain in the situation they were in when God called them.


25 Now about virgins: I have no command from the Lord, but I give a judgment as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy. 26 Because of the present crisis, I think that it is good for a man to remain as he is. 27 Are you pledged to a woman? Do not seek to be released. Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife. 28 But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this.

29 What I mean, brothers and sisters, is that the time is short. From now on those who have wives should live as if they do not; 30 those who mourn, as if they did not; those who are happy, as if they were not; those who buy something, as if it were not theirs to keep; 31 those who use the things of the world, as if not engrossed in them. For this world in its present form is passing away.

32 I would like you to be free from concern. An unmarried man is concerned about the Lord’s affairs—how he can please the Lord. 33 But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife— 34 and his interests are divided. An unmarried woman or virgin is concerned about the Lord’s affairs: Her aim is to be devoted to the Lord in both body and spirit. But a married woman is concerned about the affairs of this world—how she can please her husband. 35 I am saying this for your own good, not to restrict you, but that you may live in a right way in undivided devotion to the Lord.

36 If anyone is worried that he might not be acting honorably toward the virgin he is engaged to, and if his passions are too strong[b] and he feels he ought to marry, he should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married. 37 But the man who has settled the matter in his own mind, who is under no compulsion but has control over his own will, and who has made up his mind not to marry the virgin—this man also does the right thing. 38 So then, he who marries the virgin does right, but he who does not marry her does better.[c]

39 A woman is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to marry anyone she wishes, but he must belong to the Lord. 40 In my judgment, she is happier if she stays as she is—and I think that I too have the Spirit of God.

 

Hmm … we begin with Chapter 7—how interesting that we begin again here. I can see where a surface reading on what Paul writes in these first few verses would be reasonable advice, and note that he states this is a concession and not a command. In other words, people were of TRADITIONS—RELIGIOUS/POLITICAL places within culture, practice and belief, and demanded to know how things should be. If a child comes to you and demands to know what he should do about a big-headed wizard of oz type, who wished to stone Lily-May because he caught her flirting with a man that was not her husband and assumed she must be guilty of more … then the people who were of a more generous output would have something to show the council … and this includes all of writings by Paul’s hand as well as other writings of Holy Scripture. One has only to HEAR its Voice and one knows the true command, and that it is garnered through Love.

SOME THINGS NEEDED TO BE REMOVED FOR THE EVOLUTION OF GOD AND MAN.

One through seven is not just a livelihood for convenience and safety, but a generational quest. The Angels of Revelation shower gifts upon those showing the silver lining. If you make a commitment, stick to it, but to be without the oath of marriage for the sake of Marriage is a “remembering of ME—Christ”.

First, some of these passages come off as clumsy, and it is not because Paul was clumsy; how Man interpreted/translated some of the original is clumsy. That said, one never fully knows how one is called and used for the purpose unto God, especially the children, as these will grow in a world unlike our own, and one must be able to see the good and evil of this. What tears at the fabric of innocence for self-serving purposes may be a terminable illness later. Do not subject your children to the uncertain outcome of thought and opinion, which may include your own, without understanding of where and how Conscience reaches. As each generation comes to pass, we hope for restoration of the minds and hearts of all. We see the wounding and know the importance of Conscience—a realizing of where others may be in their belief and nonbelief. Not everyone is in the same place, including married couples, their children and those within partnering of vocation and craft. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that. This is really where Paul is when speaking on marriage. All of the above is written (even in its man-clumsy wording) with the intent of one to God, and this gifting within Relations.

There is a Partnering unlike the traditions of marriage which is not understood by the minds of Religionists, or they would not be bound to Religious Dogma (of any stripe), and this is where Paul is, and hopes that you will be also. The firecrackers are incidental, and for one striving in gnosis, marriage of man in his traditions, whatever they may be, is not the quest. The quest is the higher Realm in Understanding—what Paul is speaking of when he states that each has his own gift from God.

Go through these passages: ask—-seek—knock on each door of these firmaments and learn its endeavor. Man implemented in ways disagreeable to Spiritual well being in IMPARTIAL ALLIANCE and caused much warring. If these “marriages” cause warring—like the hand that steals and tortures—do away with it. God knows you or He doesn’t know you. The eye—the hand—these are SYMBOLIC avenues of something agreeable or disagreeable in and of Spiritual Wellness, which to one of gnosis includes all of the body—its health and wellbeing … and this in the understanding of loving neighbor as self.

 

People without imagination suffer from the Authority of Realization. Reality and Realization are not the same. They do not have the same parent. How is this? God is a redeeming Feature in likeness unto its own. This brings us back to what is said in Genesis, but Man has assumed God is like his own image, which is of a limited place of truth, and is where he binds words and people to doctrine he has taken from Wisdom texts. He cannot see all in this IMAGE (of God)—its food is too, too rich—and man, as adolescent, cannot handle such wealth of Spirit. Paul speaks armorously on this plane, but it is a moving, flowing place—a continuous climb or walk or reach, depending on how gift ignites and partners with Conscience. Reason plays the catalyst in this partnering. One asks another, “Why do you see that man’s marriage (carriage) as evil?” What happens in this is the man being questioned must choose his words from a pool of understanding … interestingly, the understanding has been acquired through ‘something’ and this then filtered through experience, general propaganda—yada-yada—many pieces, including his EMOTIONS (reactions?). He may use a flat understanding of Scripture as his answer. He may consider his questioner as testing the spirit within so he may say that such marriage demonstrative is unfavorable to Society in that it may prevail and give rise to ‘disease’ (of some sort). To a small degree, he may be correct, but the larger picture is not sealed. Many questions come forth that he must also answer, and if he refuses .. he denies the necessary exegesis for Spirit Uniting. Remember, God is impartial, and what desires to work in and through human is of this impartiality, but it cannot unite where it is denied. Whether or not the man’s carriage is “evil”(through man’s vision) is not of concern in where Spirit wishes to ignite for growth, because Man must first be of a nonpartisan place before he can see the fuller “condition” of himself in the marriage beds … of his choosing. Once he begins this process, the answer becomes the price one pays to enter the stream of Conscience on Truth—truth about himself, truth about what he chooses, truth about his intent in these … and this for both sides of the divide. Neither mind can know while living in darkness about himself. The conclusion on this is that man’s marriage is generally a convenience of lifestyle. The real marriage exists within the heart of Humanity, and this has everything to do with the Image of God.

*******************************************

Listen to the Roman Pontiff’s recent words:

“There are two ways of thinking and of having faith: we can fear to lose the saved and we can want to save the lost,” Francis told hundreds of cardinals and bishops arrayed before him in St. Peter’s Basilica at a Mass centered on the Gospel story of Jesus healing a leper rather than rejecting him.

http://www.religionnews.com/2015/02/15/pope-francis-preaches-gospel-marginalized-calls-open-welcoming-church/#comments

 

He ASSUMES he is correct in his Doctrine on “the lost” (how he has translated and interpreted Holy Scripture, and what his predecessors had created for themselves from this)—he assumes the Roman Dynasty is God’s own—he assumes God is calling him to these spectacles. What if God does not know him because the INTENT and EVIL acts of the Crusades and the Inquisition, the Catholic Church’s partnering with Fascist Dictatorship in Spain and elsewhere …

——and the false celibacy of the priesthood and the abuse of women and children, not to mention the discrimination of these, the RAPES and MOLESTATIONS (which includes the refusal and denial that these were and are occurring for centuries-and the coverups that continue to this day—

http://ncronline.org/blogs/ncr-today/francis-argentina-abuse-record-questioned

——and the corruption, and misuse of money from the poor … all of which hang heavy on his robes of elitism and malpractice without proper repentance … has GOD SAYING, “DEPART FROM ME! I NEVER KNEW YOU!” ? The Religionists assume too much. The Holy Spirit cannot align with INSTRUMENTS of mass destruction … the Holy Spirit cannot align with those wedded to false Doctrine … the Holy Spirit cannot unite where deception, abuse, misuse and poor navigation is clearly apparent. The pope must think God a brutal and deceptive dictator. Look at the history of the Roman Catholic Church, or any Religious Institution, and ask yourself: WOULD JESUS DO THIS IN HIS FATHER’S NAME? Is this the Image of God?

Do not continue to allow yourselves to be without knowledge on the history of your making. Know your history. Learn the truth about the intent and rise of organized Religious venue and understand its fruits—good or evil? Godly or lost? We see much foolishness and poor parenting in these halls of decoration and self-elevation. It is sad affairs. A nun can say she is married to Jesus and be aligned inconsistently within a larger marriage of false impression and magisterial control, one that is not in keeping with God’s command on Love. To live within this at this time is a marriage unto darkness  … for movement within the mind and heart is the essential parenting within the Spirit Gifts. Remain not in ignorance, but allow for a Return to Light.

Where people without imagination suffer from Authority of Realization is when they remove the SYMBOLIC gesture in the equivalence of hearing the voice of Truth, and remain investigating in a pool of nonobservance. They genuflect in corridors of their own creating in image rather than the REALITY that Man must move to evolve. Realizing that Supreme Being exists is a wondrous realization but this is not contained within itself and is not itself parent. OUR image—our likeness (within Genesis) is a continuous flow of realizations without manmade authority in contrived doctrines. God is not to be mocked! Man can joke and be sarcastic, even blasphemous, but this inquiry does not hold a candle to Truth. Wisdom is not an artifact. It is a pioneer of sustaining Feature congruent in its manifestation on Image of God—OUR Community—A Communing wave of eyelashes so vast and so ferocious in Gift it’ll knock your socks off 🙂

 

 

 

Peace and Love

Advertisements
13 Comments
  1. opheliart permalink

    We would imagine the Religionists get broiled over Stephen’s words. We shared on his position in comments on previous essays … so we don’t need to go into it here, but any Christian calling himself a Christian must look at the history and realize its roots. If you stay in a cell listening only to what individuals of specific cults tell you, which might very well include Stephen’s Celestial Torah, you never get where you need to be if you say you are seeking God. However, sometimes events move you whether you like it or not …

    Stephen Lewis February 14, 2015 at 8:54 am ——-(on RNS)
    Susan, I’m Jewish and most definitely Christian, as was Yeishu/Jesus. You have been swindled by priests of Judah as have all Jews falling for Judah’s lies and Wizard of Oz mesmerization of believers with massive amounts of literature, priestly goo-gahs, glittery robes and the most manipulated language in the world, made to conform to Judah’s religious ideas and thus lose the Canaanite dialect meanings of the Hebrew language. In order to find key religious ideas in Bible to trace them back before Hebrews wrote their myths of origin, I had to use Arabic which is closer to Aramaic now and ancient Egyptian where so many “Jewish” religious ideas originated. Such as the Torah..

    You may or may not have noticed that I’ve been challenging rabbis, actually over a year now, to tell us the historical root of the major religious concept of Judaism, the Torah. None of them respond and if they can, they routinely censored my question and had me banned from Judaism discussions with of course lot’s of “anti-Semitism” slander thrown at me. Rabbis are afraid to answer my question because they don’t know the real etymology of the word “Torah” and I do. I have a presentation that explains how the Jewish Torah was derived from ancient Egypt’s religious cult which was based as most ancient religions were in structure, upon astro-theological construction, Priests of Judah divorced astrological linkage to their earthly Torah in order to prevent us Jews from finding out where they got their basic religious idea by stealing it from Egyptian religion. You don’t know any of this because rabbis don’t know it now but do know Judaism’s core beliefs cannot withstand either historical or moral scrutiny. Judaism has already fallen as Israeli archeology proves the Hebrew authors of the Torah/Tanakh were great story tellers and myth-makers, but truthful historians they were not at all as they fabricated the Jewish religion by reworking far more older pagan religious ideas into a Jewish tribal form, evidently to meld three different Canaanite tribes into one “Israel”, that name itself a complete lie in Hebrew, “he struggles with EL” is really the Hebrew priests of Judah capturing the three main gods of Egypt in the name, “Israel” – – Isis, Ra, EL. Moon, Sun, Saturn, each special to Egypt and EL the top God of Canaan as well. Judaism is packed with pagan god capturing tales because religious warfare is what Judaism is all about. Creating a platform for religious war with 98% of the human race branded, exactly like white supremacists brand all non-white races in their form of blanket racism, as “inferior” human beings, subspecies, and never to be allowed intermarriage with the Superior Ones.

    Judaism can’t be held as a moral or spiritual religion and why keep a racist cult neurosis going any longer by protecting Jewish cult against needed criticism? Why make future generations of Jews, kids accept a pack of ancient lies instead of telling them the truth about the origins of Judaism in religious theft, a common enough phenomena that there’s no dishonor in exposing the truth now, all religions do what Judah priests did only not all religions got the backing of a super power, Roman Empire, to spread their gospel. Pauline Christianity did and politically overpowers Judaism which is why Israel seeks and needs Evangelical Christian support to exist, to keep that lie going, the Eretz Yisrael racist one that seeks to replace Arab Gentile (not really) Palestinians with European Jewish convert descendants like you and me. Making Pals the scapegoat for European Gentile treatment of European Jews.

    Any way you look at it, Judaism has spawned its share of needless misery inflicted on Jews by selfish rabbis who won’t tell the truth. No real Torah knowledge in them, only Hebrew religious propaganda and lot’s of it to snow Jews who don’t bother to check what they’ve been born into.

    Christianity follows the Celestial Torah which is why it quickly overtook Judaism to become Gentile accepted as Judaism hides the true Torah as it replaced it with reworked pagan religious ideas claimed exclusive to Judaism when it never was. E.g. the foundational word “Torah” is not Hebrew at all but Egyptian derived. I teach Celestial Torah Christianity which is the world’s oldest religious symbolic system. It is even cited by Jewish priesthood as the Source of their earthly Torah and it is, but nothing like the way they’re makeover job done after there were virtually no ancient Egyptian priests around to counter the Jewish priesthood lies about the Torah’s origins. And of course attached to Pauline Christianity, this cover up has lasted up unto this very day.

    The challenge to rabbis to prove me wrong is always there but never accepted. They count on religious cult loyalty to ignore critics and keep the whole phony ball of wax going on and on to the next generations. I’ve woken up and I urge you and all Jews to do the same. Doesn’t mean losing tribal identity at all but does mean freeing ourselves of falsehoods and getting real with Gentile peoples who we really are who come from European Ashkenazim descent.

    • opheliart permalink

      whether one agrees or disagrees with what Stephen writes (and we would imagine many agree on points in what he writes, but would not enter in his form of GNOSTIC Religion) … one cannot deny the part about the ARAMAIC language. Those of Judaism did take and refashion a “truth” of sorts for their ideals—-no differently than what the men of Rome instituted.

      Peace

  2. opheliart permalink

    N February 15, 2015 at 10:14 am
    “This guy?” “This guy” is the Vicar of Christ. You can disagree with his assessment in this manner, but your dismissive choice of words shows a flagrant disrespect for his position.

    The above is from the Gibson article posted in the essay …

    This always demonstrates sheer ignorance on the part of Religionists—those enslaved in a culture of their vicars as holy men. WHY, pray tell, would one of SPIRITUAL gnosis view the Roman Pontiff as his vicar of Christ? It’s like saying, you must bow to the Political Magistrate that has silenced you for centuries—the same one that took the Christ MESSAGE and CRUCIFIED IT 70 times seven.

    Respect his position? For WHAT purpose? He is not OUR God—OUR Holiness?

    Peace

    • opheliart permalink

      Vicar of Christ throughout the INQUISITION? Aligning with Fascist Franco? This SAME vicar?

      Get real, peeps … you are seriously undernourished!

      • opheliart permalink

        and do they expect that we are to call their priests father? Spiritually speaking, there is NO WAY the RC priests can BE OUR father? And if we DESIRE gnosis … it would be a really really good move to put aside these childish games …

        and set a better example for the youth in how and who they are to TRUST.

        Peace

  3. opheliart permalink

    Atheist Max February 18, 2015 at 12:00 pm (RNS article on doing the Ash Wednesday thing)
    @Neon,

    “your own disgusting misogyny”

    Wrong – Nothing is more generally important to me in our society right now than women’s rights! Women’s emancipation has been the silver bullet of success in every society which tried it.

    *******************************************

    Just not my rights, Max—isn’t that correct? When I was commenting on RNS articles, you would not allow me my right to share … you lied about me (us). It is you who are dishonest, Max.

    As for the Ash business … hey everybody! Look at me!!!! I am observant! What? Once or twice a year you mourn? Why not study your history and when you see what your Religion did to set itself up as god of Society … then let’s see how you mourn! Or hey, what about all those children you continue to allow to be sexually abused? … Do ya think you might be gearing up to do some very serious mourning—weeping—wailing? Their blood is on YOU! Do not think that you are not also responsible for these—you continue in PRIDE.

    • opheliart permalink

      Does God really observe these spectacles? The Religious drag God down to their own level of embarrassing motives. Pride, worship of rituals, worship of priests, bishops and popes … discrimination in full regalia … enslavement … hustling … parading self as if beacons of something Godly … the sainting ads … their ill intent on how to make a martyr …

      … PUT AWAY THE THINGS OF A CHILD says Paul.

      • opheliart permalink

        Would Jesus behave as these … or would he call out this hypocrisy? Would He speak about the slave and the free?

  4. opheliart permalink

    The Roman Catholic Church loves itself. But does it love those not like it enough to stop parading itself … and to demonstrate impartially? Can it stop grabbing at the spotlight? Can it show TRUE HUMILITY? Does it love LOVE enough to do away with all these material things, and observances that are more stumbling blocks than they are teaching them on WHAT IS GOD? SPIRIT cannot be manipulated and packaged into their chalices, their priests, bishops, popes, doctrine, rituals … This is NOT how Spirit operates. The RCC must think God quite feeble, and quite easy to manipulate and control … they must think God is an ash smear … a big gold ring … frilly frocks and massive crosses with a bloodied Jesus hanging limp on it … their God is material, and full of ritual that denies LIGHT. They need their “things” and their “titles” and their “rituals” and they want the WORLD to see how big and great and observant they are. They are so full of this type of observance they cannot even see beyond their own …

    Big difference between this:

    And he said unto them, Take nothing for your journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.

    And the RC “holy” men.

    • opheliart permalink

      and their admirers, or those who have something to gain from this do not think this Prosletyzism?

      This is most definitely PROSLETYZING. When the Roman Church saw the advantage of this … the men with large girth realized they no longer had to go out “taking nothing for their journey” … they set themselves up on big highchairs and dictated to the masses … sending many to their graves … and if the people got uppity … let’s give a saint or a martyr, or how about an Immaculate Mary and a few indulgences to settle matters …
      hmm … no wonder there are so many ATHEISTS AND SECULARISTS IN THE WORLD —looking at this would give one a head ache … which led to a my-grain 🙂

      Peace

  5. opheliart permalink

    here’s a doozy …
    http://news.yahoo.com/democrats-criticize-giuliani-comments-obamas-patriotism-164014416–election.html

    he doesn’t love you? that’s biting the hand and this guy is going to feel the pinch—oh yes …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: