Skip to content

“The Flood” by Demography (a continuation)

August 20, 2014

Who writes the speeches for the popes of the Roman Catholic Church?


“In this spirit of openness to others, I earnestly hope that those countries of your continent with whom the Holy See does not yet enjoy a full relationship may not hesitate to further a dialogue for the benefit of all,” he said.

Then deviating from his text, he added; “I’m not talking here only about a political dialogue, but about a fraternal dialogue. These Christians aren’t coming as conquerors, they aren’t trying to take away our identity.” He said the important thing was to “walk together.”


Who does the pope and his colleagues walk with? No FEMININE BREATH in that speech. Why? Roman Catholics/Catholics, put on your thinking caps and tell me why there is no Spirit in that speech?  Do you believers of this hierarchal system agree that “fraternal” is an appropriate choice of wording? If the Vatican is now pushing for ecumenism, which is what I have witnessed in recent acts from the  hierarchy of this organization, then why not “ecumenical” dialogue instead of “fraternal” dialogue?




Vatican, what are you really telling the world? You prefer men? Good gracious me … just come out and say that you desire males instead of hiding behind your fancy frocks and acting like you are some kind of spiritual oasis of forbidden fruit not to be seen naked.

Ah, but you ARE seen in your nakedness, and this is why you are OUTSIDE the temple for 42 months.


THE GOSPEL OF PHILIP… Some people are afraid that they may arise from the dead naked, and so they want to arise in flesh. They do not know that it is those who wear the [flesh]  who are naked. Those who are able to take it off are not naked.

“Flesh and blood will not inherit God’s Kingdom.” What is this flesh that will not * inherit?  It is what we are wearing.  And what is this that WILL inherit? It is the flesh and blood of Jesus.

For this reason he said, “One who does not eat my flesh and drink my blood does not have life within.” What does this mean? His flesh is the WORD (Truth-Light) and his blood is the HOLY SPIRIT. Whoever has received these has food, drink, and clothing.


Now, why does the Roman Catholic Church not agree with what Angel Philip is used to write in this ascesis?






In this world those who wear clothes are superior to the clothes. In heaven’s kingdom the clothes are superior to those who wear them.

No one enters the KINGDOM naked.

The Gospel of Philip



Now … the pope should NOT be engaging as a politician, dealing in politics with Political Leaders. The beheading of the American journalist who was in captivity since 2012 is just one reason why. There are many things tied up in these negotiations and evil always has something up its sleeve. If you have vision beyond the grave, you are aware of what is at stake. A “shepherd” is in no way qualified for this, and neither is his one-sided institution. He may have vision to share that is of Spiritual Consequence, and this requires deep and devoted council in the Realm of the Spirit, but to “react” as the world, without “seeing” is not a wise and just means of operation. Man chooses where he makes his beds. It is a complex stream. I have shared in this before on SPIR. RELIGION, especially as large as the RCC should not be engaging in these affairs, unless, of course, they desire to be as they once were: Head of State. In this case, then they would need to reclassify themselves that the world might know where they stand, and how they are to be sanctioned and dealt with. The ROMAN Catholic Institution has far too much partiality to be of fair and just practice, as their “interests” can be found in just about every country in the world.

Also, the RCC has not been able to protect its children, nor have they realized the women in a manner Christlike. This alone is a necessary command from those of Humanistic licenses. If they want to show something to the world, why don’t they show how to be fair, just, impartial, respectful and of a non populist humility, and not setting itself up as King of Christianity?

And when ye pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, that love to stand and pray in the synagogues and corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men: Amen I say to you, they have received their reward. Matthew 6.5


Now, read this again: I’m not talking here only about a political dialogue, but about a FRATERNAL dialogue.

Once again, the voice of the Feminine is completely disregarded. What are these men thinking? This is a SECULAR statement. This is not of the Spirit, as any one of Spiritual Understanding knows … THE WORK OF THE SPIRIT IS NOT SINGULARLY MASCULINE. Energy and Essence of the Godhood is a PARENTHOOD LIKENESS OF SENSE AND REASON, and is never dictated through singular practice of male overture. Where is the pope’s Spirit Mentor? He excludes [this] in this fraternal dialogue! Can he say: It is not I, but the one who works in and through me.

And Peter opening his mouth, said: In very deed I perceive, that God is not a respecter of persons. Acts 10.34

So Peter opened his mouth and said: “Truly I understand that God shows no partiality, Acts 10.34

Then Peter replied, “I see very clearly that God shows no favoritism. Acts 10.34


At some point in the walk, the believer must come into awareness on his Spiritual Guide.


And I will ask the Father, and he shall give you another Paraclete, that he may abide with you for ever. John 14.6




… I am the way, the truth and the life, no one comes to the FATHER except through me. John 14.6






When asked about the possibility of women priests, Pope Francis has said “that door is closed.” Closed, Fran? Really? Looks like the RCC is in for a bUmPy RiDe …




Continued …


Peace and Love



One Comment
  1. opheliart permalink


    Alf, do you notice how the pope is an OPEN pope when it comes to allowing the priests their desires, but the door is closed when it comes to the desires of the women?


    RE: Married priests
    “The comments were immediately denied by Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi who said that the interviewer — the newspaper’s 90-year-old founder, Eugenio Scalfari — had not written down the exact quotations.

    “This is not at all an interview in the normal sense of the word,” Lombardi said of the one-to-one conversation between Francis and Scalfari, even accusing the newspaper of manipulating “naive readers” with inaccuracies.

    It was the second time that a papal interview with Scalfari has raised some hackles in the Vatican, leading to the question of whether the pope could be using these conservations as a way of bypassing traditional Vatican communications.

    Father Papas Jani Pecoraro, an Italy-based married priest from the Greek Byzantine church, which is under Vatican authority, welcomed the pope’s reported comments.

    Speaking to La Repubblica, he said: “The issue could not only change the relationship between the Catholic Church and the lay world but also with other churches.”

    “We have to read the times and there is no doubt that today’s society raises questions that a married priest is definitely better able to cope with,” he said.

    A Vatican expert, speaking to AFP on condition of anonymity, said that as a whole Francis was seen as “an open pope”.”
    AFP Olivier Baube

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: